---
title: "Microsoft Entra alternatives in 2026 — IDSync"
description: "Compare Microsoft Entra alternatives for workforce IAM and SSO across enterprise, SMB, and open source. Compare features, pricing, fit, and alternatives…"
lang: en
json-ld: |
  [
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "Article",
      "headline": "Best Microsoft Entra alternatives in 2026",
      "description": "Compare Microsoft Entra alternatives for workforce IAM and SSO across enterprise, SMB, and open source. Compare features, pricing, fit, and alternatives…",
      "url": "https://idsync.com/alternatives/microsoft-entra",
      "dateModified": "2026-05-31T13:32:15.631476+00:00",
      "author": {
        "@type": "Organization",
        "@id": "https://idsync.com/#organization",
        "name": "IDSync"
      },
      "publisher": {
        "@type": "Organization",
        "@id": "https://idsync.com/#organization",
        "name": "IDSync"
      },
      "about": [
        {
          "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
          "name": "Microsoft Entra",
          "url": "https://idsync.com/directory/microsoft-entra"
        },
        {
          "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
          "name": "Okta",
          "url": "https://idsync.com/directory/okta"
        },
        {
          "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
          "name": "Ping Identity",
          "url": "https://idsync.com/directory/ping-identity"
        },
        {
          "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
          "name": "JumpCloud",
          "url": "https://idsync.com/directory/jumpcloud"
        },
        {
          "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
          "name": "WorkOS",
          "url": "https://idsync.com/directory/workos"
        },
        {
          "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
          "name": "Keycloak",
          "url": "https://idsync.com/directory/keycloak"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
      "itemListElement": [
        {
          "@type": "ListItem",
          "position": 1,
          "name": "Home",
          "item": "https://idsync.com/"
        },
        {
          "@type": "ListItem",
          "position": 2,
          "name": "Compare",
          "item": "https://idsync.com/compare"
        },
        {
          "@type": "ListItem",
          "position": 3,
          "name": "Microsoft Entra alternatives",
          "item": "https://idsync.com/alternatives/microsoft-entra"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "ItemList",
      "name": "Best Microsoft Entra alternatives in 2026",
      "url": "https://idsync.com/alternatives/microsoft-entra",
      "itemListElement": [
        {
          "@type": "ListItem",
          "position": 1,
          "name": "Microsoft Entra",
          "url": "https://idsync.com/directory/microsoft-entra"
        },
        {
          "@type": "ListItem",
          "position": 2,
          "name": "Okta",
          "url": "https://idsync.com/directory/okta"
        },
        {
          "@type": "ListItem",
          "position": 3,
          "name": "Ping Identity",
          "url": "https://idsync.com/directory/ping-identity"
        },
        {
          "@type": "ListItem",
          "position": 4,
          "name": "JumpCloud",
          "url": "https://idsync.com/directory/jumpcloud"
        },
        {
          "@type": "ListItem",
          "position": 5,
          "name": "WorkOS",
          "url": "https://idsync.com/directory/workos"
        },
        {
          "@type": "ListItem",
          "position": 6,
          "name": "Keycloak",
          "url": "https://idsync.com/directory/keycloak"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "FAQPage",
      "mainEntity": []
    }
  ]
---

[![IDSync — identity software buyer platform](/assets/idsync-logo-BKS89EW4.png)](/)

[Directory](/directory)

[Compare](/compare)

[Resources](/resources)

[Browse tools](/directory)[Run Stack Finder](/stack-finder)

1.  [Home](/)
2.  [Directory](/directory)
3.  Microsoft Entra alternatives 

# Best Microsoft Entra alternatives in 2026

Last updated 3 months ago

Quick answer

## Best Microsoft Entra alternatives in 2026

Short answer

The top Microsoft Entra alternatives are Okta for cross-cloud workforce IAM, Ping Identity for complex federation, JumpCloud for SMBs, and Keycloak for open source deployments.

Related tools & categories

[Workforce IAM](/directory/category/workforce-iam)[SSO](/directory/category/sso)[Identity Governance / IGA](/directory/category/iga)

## Best options at a glance

Category

Tool

Best for

Best overall

[Okta](/directory/okta)

Enterprise and mid-market organizations seeking a vendor-neutral, cloud-first IAM platform with a broad application integration catalog. Particularly strong for organizations running heterogeneous SaaS environments with a mix of cloud and on-premises applications.

Best for enterprise

[Ping Identity](/directory/ping-identity)

Large enterprises in regulated industries — financial services, insurance, healthcare, and government — that require advanced federation, FAPI compliance, hybrid deployment, and support for legacy identity protocols. Organizations with complex, custom identity requirements and dedicated identity engineering teams.

Best for startups

[JumpCloud](/directory/jumpcloud)

SMB and mid-market organizations with cross-platform device environments (Mac, Linux, Windows) who want to consolidate identity and device management without Active Directory or Intune complexity. Particularly popular with technology companies, creative agencies, and distributed teams.

Best developer-first

[WorkOS](/directory/workos)

B2B SaaS companies that are losing or at risk of losing enterprise deals because they lack SAML SSO, SCIM directory sync, or audit logs, and want to ship these features quickly without deep identity protocol expertise.

Best open source

[Keycloak](/directory/keycloak)

Organizations that require a fully open source, self-hosted IAM platform with enterprise-grade features and no licensing cost. Strong fit for large enterprises with technical resources to operate it, government agencies with data sovereignty requirements, and universities or research institutions managing complex identity federation.

Buyer help

### Request a vendor shortlist

Tell us what you're evaluating and IDSync will identify the identity, access, and security tools that fit your use case.

[Request shortlist →](/request-shortlist)

## Vendor comparison

Vendor

Best for

Deployment

Open source

Pricing

![Microsoft Entra company logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?sz=128&domain=microsoft.com)

[Microsoft Entra](/directory/microsoft-entra)

Reference 

Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft 365, Azure, Intune, or Windows Server Active Directory. Entra ID's native integration with the Microsoft ecosystem is a primary competitive advantage that is difficult to replicate with any third-party platform.

SaaS / Cloud-hosted, Hybrid (via Entra Connect for on-premises AD)

[Tiered (Free, P1, P2); often bundled in M365 E3/E5 licensing](https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/business/microsoft-entra-pricing)

![Okta company logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?sz=128&domain=okta.com)

[Okta](/directory/okta)

Best overall 

Enterprise and mid-market organizations seeking a vendor-neutral, cloud-first IAM platform with a broad application integration catalog. Particularly strong for organizations running heterogeneous SaaS environments with a mix of cloud and on-premises applications.

SaaS / Cloud-hosted

[Per-user per month; MAU-based for Customer Identity (Auth0); add-on modules for governance and lifecycle](https://www.okta.com/pricing/)

![Ping Identity company logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?sz=128&domain=pingidentity.com)

[Ping Identity](/directory/ping-identity)

Best for enterprise 

Large enterprises in regulated industries — financial services, insurance, healthcare, and government — that require advanced federation, FAPI compliance, hybrid deployment, and support for legacy identity protocols. Organizations with complex, custom identity requirements and dedicated identity engineering teams.

SaaS / Cloud-hosted (PingOne), Self-hosted (PingFederate, PingDirectory), Hybrid

Enterprise-negotiated; no published list pricing

![JumpCloud company logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?sz=128&domain=jumpcloud.com)

[JumpCloud](/directory/jumpcloud)

Best for startups 

SMB and mid-market organizations with cross-platform device environments (Mac, Linux, Windows) who want to consolidate identity and device management without Active Directory or Intune complexity. Particularly popular with technology companies, creative agencies, and distributed teams.

SaaS / Cloud-hosted

[Per-user per month; free tier up to 10 users (verify current terms)](https://jumpcloud.com/pricing)

![WorkOS company logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?sz=128&domain=workos.com)

[WorkOS](/directory/workos)

Best developer-first 

B2B SaaS companies that are losing or at risk of losing enterprise deals because they lack SAML SSO, SCIM directory sync, or audit logs, and want to ship these features quickly without deep identity protocol expertise.

SaaS / Cloud-hosted

[Per SSO/Directory Sync connection per month](https://workos.com/pricing)

![Keycloak company logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?sz=128&domain=keycloak.org)

[Keycloak](/directory/keycloak)

Best open source 

Organizations that require a fully open source, self-hosted IAM platform with enterprise-grade features and no licensing cost. Strong fit for large enterprises with technical resources to operate it, government agencies with data sovereignty requirements, and universities or research institutions managing complex identity federation.

Self-hosted

Free (open source); Red Hat SSO commercial support available separately

Buyer help

### Request a vendor shortlist

Tell us what you're evaluating and IDSync will identify the identity, access, and security tools that fit your use case.

[Request shortlist →](/request-shortlist)

## When to choose each tool

### [Microsoft Entra](/directory/microsoft-entra)

Microsoft Entra ID is Microsoft's cloud-based identity and access management service, providing SSO, MFA, Conditional Access, and identity governance tightly integrated with Microsoft 365 and Azure.

Choose when

You need organizations heavily invested in microsoft 365, azure, intune, or windows server active directory. entra id's native integration with the microsoft ecosystem is a primary competitive advantage that is difficult to replicate with any third-party platform..

Skip when

Your priorities sit outside Microsoft Entra's core focus areas.

### [Okta](/directory/okta)

Okta is a leading cloud-native identity and access management platform offering SSO, MFA, lifecycle management, and identity governance for enterprise workforce and customer-facing applications.

Choose when

You need enterprise and mid-market organizations seeking a vendor-neutral, cloud-first iam platform with a broad application integration catalog. particularly strong for organizations running heterogeneous saas environments with a mix of cloud and on-premises applications..

Skip when

Your priorities sit outside Okta's core focus areas.

### [Ping Identity](/directory/ping-identity)

Ping Identity provides enterprise IAM with advanced federation, financial-grade API security, and hybrid cloud/on-premises deployment options, commonly deployed in financial services, healthcare, and government.

Choose when

You need large enterprises in regulated industries — financial services, insurance, healthcare, and government — that require advanced federation, fapi compliance, hybrid deployment, and support for legacy identity protocols. organizations with complex, custom identity requirements and dedicated identity engineering teams..

Skip when

Your priorities sit outside Ping Identity's core focus areas.

### [JumpCloud](/directory/jumpcloud)

JumpCloud is a cloud directory platform providing unified identity management, SSO, MFA, and device management (MDM) across Windows, Mac, and Linux environments — popular with SMB and mid-market organizations.

Choose when

You need smb and mid-market organizations with cross-platform device environments (mac, linux, windows) who want to consolidate identity and device management without active directory or intune complexity. particularly popular with technology companies, creative agencies, and distributed teams..

Skip when

Your priorities sit outside JumpCloud's core focus areas.

### [WorkOS](/directory/workos)

WorkOS provides a developer API for adding enterprise identity features — SSO, SCIM directory sync, audit logs, and admin portals — to B2B SaaS applications, enabling faster enterprise sales readiness.

Choose when

You need b2b saas companies that are losing or at risk of losing enterprise deals because they lack saml sso, scim directory sync, or audit logs, and want to ship these features quickly without deep identity protocol expertise..

Skip when

Your priorities sit outside WorkOS's core focus areas.

### [Keycloak](/directory/keycloak)

Keycloak is the most widely deployed open source IAM platform, providing enterprise-grade SSO, MFA, SAML, OIDC, LDAP, and Kerberos support in a self-hosted, Apache 2.0 licensed package maintained by Red Hat.

Choose when

You need organizations that require a fully open source, self-hosted iam platform with enterprise-grade features and no licensing cost. strong fit for large enterprises with technical resources to operate it, government agencies with data sovereignty requirements, and universities or research institutions managing complex identity federation..

Skip when

Your priorities sit outside Keycloak's core focus areas.

## Implementation considerations

-   Confirm SSO, SCIM, and MFA requirements with your security and IT teams before shortlisting.
-   Map directory sources (HRIS, AD, Google Workspace) and provisioning targets to validate coverage.
-   Review audit logging, session controls, and admin RBAC against your compliance scope (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, FedRAMP).
-   For developer-first stacks, evaluate SDK quality, framework support, and webhook reliability.
-   For enterprise stacks, plan a 60–90 day pilot covering federation, lifecycle, and governance flows.

## Pricing considerations

Most identity vendors price on monthly active users, employees, or features (SSO, MFA, lifecycle, governance). Always request a multi-year quote, validate add-on fees (SCIM, advanced MFA, audit logs), and account for implementation services.

## Best Microsoft Entra alternatives at a glance

Tool

Best for

Key strength

Pricing model

Open source?

Okta

Multi-cloud enterprise IAM

Vendor-neutral, vast integration catalog

Per-user/month

No

Ping Identity

Enterprise federation, FAPI

Complex policy, financial-grade security

Contact vendor

No

JumpCloud

SMB, cross-platform devices

Unified directory + MDM, Linux support

Per-user/month

No

OneLogin

Mid-market workforce IAM

Easy deployment, strong MFA

Per-user/month

No

Duo Security

MFA-first, Cisco environments

Device trust, strong MFA UX

Per-user/month

No

ForgeRock

Large enterprise CIAM

Highly customizable identity journeys

Contact vendor

Partial

Keycloak

Open source enterprise

Mature, self-hosted, SAML/OIDC

Free (self-host)

Yes

Zitadel

Cloud-native open source

Modern architecture, multi-tenant

Open core

Yes

Auth0

Developer-first CIAM

Excellent DX, CIAM breadth

MAU-based

No

Google Cloud Identity

Google Workspace environments

Google ecosystem integration

Per-user/month

No

## Who this page is for

This guide is for IT directors, enterprise architects, and identity professionals evaluating alternatives to Microsoft Entra ID — either because their organization is not heavily invested in the Microsoft ecosystem, because they are seeking vendor diversification, or because specific Entra ID limitations are driving a re-evaluation.

It is also relevant for organizations using Entra ID today that are frustrated by licensing complexity, concerned about the pace of feature changes following the rebranding from Azure Active Directory, or looking to reduce dependency on Microsoft's broader licensing structure.

Finally, this page is useful for mid-market and SMB organizations that are being sold Microsoft Entra as part of an M365 bundle but want to understand whether purpose-built identity platforms might serve them better.

## How to choose

### Assess your Microsoft ecosystem dependency

The primary reason to stay with Microsoft Entra ID is deep Microsoft ecosystem integration — M365, Azure, Intune, Defender, and the full Windows infrastructure stack. If your organization is 80%+ Microsoft, the switching cost to any alternative is real and often underappreciated. If you run a heterogeneous environment (mix of AWS, GCP, Mac, Linux, non-Microsoft SaaS), the case for a vendor-neutral IAM platform strengthens considerably.

### Evaluate your device management requirements

Microsoft Entra ID's integration with Intune for device compliance and conditional access is a significant capability. If you need device posture to be part of your access control decisions, ensure your alternative either integrates with your MDM solution or provides its own (JumpCloud provides both directory and MDM in a single platform, which is distinctive at the SMB level).

### Consider your cross-platform needs

Entra ID is strongest in Windows environments. macOS, Linux, and mobile device support has improved but is generally considered secondary. JumpCloud, in particular, was built with cross-platform environments in mind and is often preferred by organizations with significant Mac or Linux footprints.

### Understand your federation and SSO complexity

For straightforward SAML/OIDC SSO to a portfolio of SaaS applications, most alternatives handle this comparably. For complex scenarios — multi-domain federation, government PIV/CAC integration, FAPI compliance for financial APIs — evaluate Ping Identity or ForgeRock, which specialize in these scenarios.

### Factor in total licensing cost

Microsoft Entra ID is often "included" in M365 or Azure AD Premium licensing. But the specific features you need may require a higher licensing tier than you currently have. Model the true incremental cost of Entra ID's required tier against the all-in cost of a purpose-built alternative.

### Review your compliance requirements

FedRAMP High authorization, CJIS compliance, and DoD IL requirements narrow the field considerably. Microsoft Entra ID has strong government cloud support (Azure Government). Alternatives vary significantly in their government compliance posture — verify directly.

## When to stick with Microsoft Entra ID

Microsoft Entra ID is the pragmatic default for organizations running Microsoft 365 at scale. The integration depth — conditional access with Intune, seamless SSO to M365 apps, Azure RBAC, Microsoft Defender for Identity signals — is genuinely difficult to replicate with any alternative.

If your identity team is primarily composed of Microsoft-certified practitioners (which is common in enterprise IT), the operational knowledge investment in Entra ID is real organizational capital that should factor into switching cost calculations.

For organizations that have purchased Microsoft E3 or E5 licensing, Entra ID capabilities are included and already paid for. The marginal cost of a dedicated IAM platform on top of that is rarely justified without a specific capability gap.

Entra ID's Conditional Access policy engine is widely considered best-in-class for Microsoft environments. If your security posture is built around it, understand what you would lose before switching.

## When to switch to an alternative

**Multi-cloud or cloud-agnostic strategy.** Organizations committed to avoiding vendor lock-in across cloud providers often prefer a neutral IAM platform that sits above AWS, Azure, and GCP rather than being anchored to one provider's identity service.

**Non-Microsoft endpoint environments.** Organizations with significant macOS, Linux, or ChromeOS device fleets often find Entra ID's device management capabilities insufficient and turn to JumpCloud or a combination of Okta plus a dedicated MDM.

**Licensing complexity and cost.** Microsoft's licensing tiers (Entra ID P1, P2, and the broader M365 licensing matrix) can be opaque and expensive. If you are paying for features you do not use or are not getting features you need without upgrading tiers, benchmark the all-in cost of alternatives.

**Developer and API experience.** If your team needs to deeply integrate identity into custom applications, Entra ID's developer experience — while improving — is generally considered less polished than Auth0, Okta, or purpose-built CIAM platforms.

**Acquisition or merger scenarios.** Mergers often create environments with mixed identity providers. A neutral IAM platform can federate across multiple identity sources more cleanly than trying to consolidate everything into Entra ID.

## Best for enterprise

### Okta Workforce Identity

Okta is the most direct enterprise-grade alternative to Microsoft Entra ID for organizations that want vendor neutrality. Its integration catalog (thousands of pre-built SAML and OIDC connectors), Universal Directory for consolidating multiple user stores, Okta Workflows for lifecycle automation, and Okta Identity Governance for access reviews make it a functionally comparable — and in some areas superior — alternative for non-Microsoft environments. Okta is particularly strong in multi-cloud and hybrid SaaS environments.

### Ping Identity (PingOne + PingFederate)

For large enterprises with complex federation requirements, financial-grade API security needs, or legacy on-premises infrastructure to support, Ping Identity offers both cloud (PingOne) and self-hosted (PingFederate) deployment models. It is a common choice in financial services, healthcare, and government where standard enterprise IAM platforms may not meet policy requirements. Pricing is enterprise-negotiated; contact vendor for current terms.

### Google Cloud Identity

For organizations that have standardized on Google Workspace, Google Cloud Identity is a natural Entra ID alternative. It provides SSO, directory services, endpoint management (via Endpoint Management or integration with Jamf/Intune), and strong integration with GCP. Its third-party SaaS integration catalog is narrower than Okta or Entra ID, but for Google-centric organizations it is a credible option.

## Best for startups and smaller teams

### JumpCloud

JumpCloud is purpose-built for the SMB to mid-market segment and is one of the most practical Entra ID alternatives for organizations that do not want to build their identity stack on top of the Microsoft ecosystem. It provides cloud directory services, SSO, MFA, device management (Windows, Mac, Linux), and RADIUS — in a single platform with transparent per-user pricing. Its free tier (up to 10 users) is useful for early-stage teams. Verify current pricing and tier limits with JumpCloud.

### OneLogin

OneLogin is a solid mid-market workforce IAM platform that competes effectively with Entra ID for organizations in the 100–2,000 employee range that want SSO, MFA, and basic lifecycle management without the complexity of enterprise platforms like Ping or the Microsoft licensing maze. It is generally considered quick to deploy and suitable for IT teams without dedicated identity specialists.

## Best developer-first option

**Okta** has the strongest developer ecosystem among Entra ID alternatives, with extensive SDKs, a developer sandbox, thorough documentation, and a large community of practitioners. For developers building applications that need to integrate with enterprise identity — rather than just deploying SSO for employees — Okta's developer tier and Auth0 (under the Okta umbrella) provide the best starting point.

For teams wanting to self-host and build on open standards, **Zitadel** offers a modern developer experience with a clean API, strong OIDC implementation, and active open source community.

## Best open source option

**Keycloak** is the most mature open source alternative for enterprise identity. Maintained by Red Hat with a large community, it supports SAML 2.0, OIDC, LDAP, Kerberos, social login, and fine-grained authorization. It is deployed in large enterprise environments and has extensive documentation. Operational complexity is the primary trade-off — running Keycloak at scale requires meaningful infrastructure expertise.

**Zitadel** is the preferred open source option for teams wanting a more modern architecture. Cloud-native (Go, Kubernetes-ready), with first-class multi-tenancy, clean OIDC implementation, and a well-designed admin UI, it is a strong choice for greenfield deployments.

## Related categories

-   [Okta alternatives](/alternatives/okta) — for a broader enterprise IAM comparison
-   [Best IAM tools for enterprises](/compare/best-iam-tools-for-enterprises) — enterprise identity platform landscape
-   [Best IAM tools for startups](/compare/best-iam-tools-for-startups) — lightweight options for smaller organizations
-   [Best open source identity tools](/compare/best-open-source-identity-tools) — self-hosted alternatives to commercial platforms
-   [Ping Identity alternatives](/alternatives/ping-identity) — if you're evaluating Ping alongside Entra
-   [Best SCIM provisioning tools](/compare/best-scim-provisioning-tools) — automated user lifecycle management

## Related resources

-   **Microsoft Entra ID vs. Okta comparison guide** — side-by-side feature and pricing breakdown for enterprise buyers
-   **IAM vendor RFP template** — structured evaluation criteria for identity platform procurement
-   **Active Directory migration checklist** — considerations for moving off on-premises AD and Entra ID
-   **Identity maturity model** — assess where your organization sits on the IAM maturity curve
-   **Conditional access policy design guide** — how to replicate Entra ID conditional access logic on alternative platforms

## Ready to evaluate your options?

IDSync helps identity and IT teams navigate complex vendor decisions with clear, buyer-focused comparisons. Browse our full IAM comparison library, download evaluation templates, or subscribe to our newsletter for updates on vendor changes and new entrants.

[Explore all IAM platform comparisons →](/compare)

## Related categories

[Workforce IAM](/directory/category/workforce-iam)[SSO](/directory/category/sso)[Identity Governance / IGA](/directory/category/iga)

### Related buyer resources

[

IAM RFP Template

Template

](/resources/iam-rfp-template)[

SSO Migration Checklist

Checklist

](/resources/sso-migration-checklist)[

Joiner / Mover / Leaver Checklist

Checklist

](/resources/joiner-mover-leaver-checklist)[

SCIM Implementation Checklist

Checklist

](/resources/scim-implementation-checklist)[

Identity Governance Readiness Checklist

Checklist

](/resources/iga-readiness-checklist)

### Further reading

[

The State of AI Agent Identity 2026

Our flagship research report — market map, 28 vendor profiles, the M&A consolidation ledger, and 12-month predictions.

](/reports/state-of-ai-agent-identity-2026)

## Related vendors

[

Microsoft Entra

Microsoft Entra ID is Microsoft's cloud-based identity and access management service, providing SSO, MFA, Conditional Access, and identity governance tightly integrated with Microsoft 365 and Azure.

](/directory/microsoft-entra)[

Okta

Okta is a leading cloud-native identity and access management platform offering SSO, MFA, lifecycle management, and identity governance for enterprise workforce and customer-facing applications.

](/directory/okta)[

Ping Identity

Ping Identity provides enterprise IAM with advanced federation, financial-grade API security, and hybrid cloud/on-premises deployment options, commonly deployed in financial services, healthcare, and government.

](/directory/ping-identity)[

JumpCloud

JumpCloud is a cloud directory platform providing unified identity management, SSO, MFA, and device management (MDM) across Windows, Mac, and Linux environments — popular with SMB and mid-market organizations.

](/directory/jumpcloud)[

WorkOS

WorkOS provides a developer API for adding enterprise identity features — SSO, SCIM directory sync, audit logs, and admin portals — to B2B SaaS applications, enabling faster enterprise sales readiness.

](/directory/workos)[

Keycloak

Keycloak is the most widely deployed open source IAM platform, providing enterprise-grade SSO, MFA, SAML, OIDC, LDAP, and Kerberos support in a self-hosted, Apache 2.0 licensed package maintained by Red Hat.

](/directory/keycloak)

IDSync provides educational buyer guidance based on publicly available information, editorial review, and user-submitted data. Vendor information should be verified before purchase. [Who we are, our methodology & disclosure policy](/about).

Rankings are based on category fit, use case, publicly available information, and editorial review. Sponsored placements are clearly labeled.

Buyer help

### Request a vendor shortlist

Tell us what you're evaluating and IDSync will identify the identity, access, and security tools that fit your use case.

[Request shortlist →](/request-shortlist)

Sponsored slot available

Reach buyers researching this comparison.

[Sponsor this page →](/sponsor)

### Run the IAM Stack Finder

Answer a few questions and get a tailored shortlist.

[Start now →](/stack-finder)

### Need implementation help?

Get matched with an IAM consultant or systems integrator.

[Request help →](/contact)

### Request a vendor shortlist

Tell us what you're comparing and we'll send a tailored list.

Work email\* 

Company

What are you comparing?

Timeline — Select — Evaluating 0–3 months 3–6 months 6–12 months

Notes (optional)

Request shortlist

[![IDSync home](/assets/idsync-logo-BKS89EW4.png)](/)

The buyer-focused platform for identity, access, and authentication software.

#### Platform

-   [Home](/)
-   [IAM Stack Finder](/stack-finder)
-   [Directory](/directory)
-   [Resources](/resources)
-   [State of AI Agent Identity 2026](/reports/state-of-ai-agent-identity-2026)
-   [Buyer Guides](/guides)
-   [Glossary](/glossary)
-   [Newsletter](/newsletter)
-   [Newsletter Archive](/newsletter/archive)

#### Best of guides

-   [All comparisons](/compare)
-   [All vendor alternatives](/alternatives)
-   [Best SSO tools](/compare/best-sso-tools)
-   [Best MFA tools](/compare/best-mfa-tools)
-   [Best PAM tools](/compare/best-pam-tools)
-   [Best IGA tools](/compare/best-iga-tools)
-   [Best CIAM tools](/compare/best-ciam-tools)
-   [Best passwordless auth](/compare/best-passwordless-authentication-tools)
-   [Best identity security](/compare/best-identity-security-tools)
-   [Best machine identity](/compare/best-machine-identity-tools)
-   [Best SaaS access governance](/compare/best-saas-access-governance-tools)
-   [Best developer auth](/compare/best-developer-authentication-tools)
-   [Best for startups](/compare/best-iam-tools-for-startups)
-   [Best for enterprises](/compare/best-iam-tools-for-enterprises)
-   [Best SCIM tools](/compare/best-scim-provisioning-tools)
-   [Best for AI agents](/compare/best-ai-agent-identity-tools)
-   [Best NHI tools](/compare/best-nhi-management-tools)
-   [Okta pricing explained](/guides/okta-pricing)
-   [Auth0 pricing explained](/guides/auth0-pricing)
-   [Okta alternatives](/alternatives/okta)
-   [Auth0 alternatives](/alternatives/auth0)

#### For Vendors

-   [Sponsor](/sponsor)
-   [Badges](/badges)
-   [Submit Product](/submit-product)
-   [Claim Profile](/claim-profile)
-   [Partner](/partner)

#### Company

-   [About & Methodology](/about)
-   [Contact](/contact)
-   [Privacy](/privacy)

Vendor names, logos, and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. IDSync is an independent buyer resource and does not imply endorsement unless explicitly stated. Logos are displayed for identification purposes only.

IDSync (idsync.com) is operated by TetraCore, Bowling Green, Ohio. It is not affiliated with the IDSync® Active Directory synchronizer by Identity Syncronizer — [learn more](/about#idsync-disambiguation).

© 2026 IDSync. All rights reserved.

Editorial independence. Sponsored placements are clearly disclosed.